From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 |
Date: | 2008-04-02 20:53:09 |
Message-ID: | 14218.1207169589@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> ... These users would like to have sha1
> (and/or other securer hashes). And they would like it in -core, because
> their hosting company don't install the contrib modules.
That line of argument could be used to justify putting anything and
everything in core. I think that our extensible architecture is an
important feature and one we should not hesitate to use to the fullest.
There is clearly work that could/should be done to improve it, such
as having better system support for packages or modules or whatever
you want to call them; and maybe we also need some marketing-type
work to encourage people such as hosting companies to allow access
to non-core packages. But allowing arguments such as the above to
drive our design is not the way to go.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-04-02 21:09:14 | Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 |
Previous Message | Mark Mielke | 2008-04-02 20:34:09 | Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-04-02 21:09:14 | Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2008-04-02 20:53:01 | Re: Several tags around PostgreSQL 7.1 broken |