Re: Testing of MVCC

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Matt Miller <mattm(at)epx(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Testing of MVCC
Date: 2005-08-16 15:12:11
Message-ID: 1419.1124205131@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah, that would be an issue. But can't a Perl script require
>> "version >= m.n" for each module it uses?

> Yes it can, but are you going to restrict building or running
> regressions to only thos platforms that have our required modules
> installed? That might be thought a tad unfriendly.

Well, how we package all this is still TBD. We might want to set it up
as a test suite completely separate from the existing regression tests.
Then, if you don't want to install the needed Perl stuff, you just don't
run it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-08-16 15:18:05 Re: Testing of MVCC
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-08-16 15:08:03 Re: Testing of MVCC

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-08-16 15:18:05 Re: Testing of MVCC
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-08-16 15:08:03 Re: Testing of MVCC