Why "vacuum_freeze_min_age" parameter has context as "USER" ?

From: sudalai <sudalait2(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Why "vacuum_freeze_min_age" parameter has context as "USER" ?
Date: 2014-12-17 09:38:50
Message-ID: 1418809130725-5831067.post@n5.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

Hi,

Can you please tell me what is the purpose of providing * USER*
context to *vacuum_freeze_min_age* parameter.
I guess vacuum process only going to use it. so if i changed
*vacuum_freeze_min_age* and issue VACCUM command on a session. Will postgres
VACCUM process takes the changes i made on the session? ...
Is any way to ensure that vacuum command takes vacuum_freeze_min_age from
session...

Thanks in advance ...
Regards,
Sudalai.

-----
sudalai
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.nabble.com/Why-vacuum-freeze-min-age-parameter-has-context-as-USER-tp5831067.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - novice mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Responses

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2014-12-17 14:48:40 Re: Why "vacuum_freeze_min_age" parameter has context as "USER" ?
Previous Message Scott Robertson 2014-12-17 07:08:44 Re: warning about console code page on starting psql