Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types
Date: 2010-10-17 20:27:42
Message-ID: 14179.1287347262@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> The only major distribution that I know of that ships the deprecated
> configuration is RedHat/Fedora. I don't know when that will change.

Red Hat switched to integer datetimes as of 8.4 ... just like upstream.
Please don't imagine that you can complain that Red Hat is behind the
curve on that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2010-10-17 20:34:28 Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-10-17 20:26:00 Re: WIP: extensible enums