Re: Postgresql and multithreading

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql and multithreading
Date: 2002-10-18 03:20:07
Message-ID: 14172.1034911207@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Let me add one more thing on this "thread". This is one email in a long
> list of "Oh, gee, you aren't using that wizz-bang new
> sync/thread/aio/raid/raw feature" discussion where someone shows up and
> wants to know why. Does anyone know how to address these, efficiently?

Simple: respond to 'em all with a one-line answer: "convince us why we
should use it". The burden of proof always seems to fall on the wrong
end in these discussions.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2002-10-18 03:21:59 Re: Postgresql and multithreading
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2002-10-18 03:18:19 Re: Postgresql and multithreading