Re: List Concatination

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: sqllist <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: List Concatination
Date: 2001-03-15 17:02:37
Message-ID: 14171.984675757@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> Note that this is probably not a good idea - the ordering of the
>> contacts will not be well-defined. When I asked about this Tom Lane was
>> quite surprised that it worked, so no guarantees about long-term
>> suitability.

> Hmmm ... this feature is very, very, useful now that I know how to use
> it. I'd love to see it hang around for future versions of PgSQL. Tom?

As I said before, user-defined aggregates are certainly not going away.
I don't recall the conversation Richard was thinking of, so I'm not sure
exactly what was at issue there. Most likely it was some fine point,
not the basic existence of the feature.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gerald Gutierrez 2001-03-15 19:42:21 VACUUM kills Index Scans ?!
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-03-15 16:35:28 Re: Some questions about PLpgSql