Re: Extending outfuncs support to utility statements

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Extending outfuncs support to utility statements
Date: 2022-09-22 16:16:30
Message-ID: 1415326.1663863390@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2022-08-24 17:25:31 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Here are patches for that.

> These patches have been failing since they were posted, afaict:
> https://cirrus-ci.com/github/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/commitfest/39/3848

> I assume that's known?

I think this is the issue Peter mentioned about needing to distinguish
between empty strings and NULL strings. We're going to need to rethink
the behavior of pg_strtok() a bit to fix that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-09-22 16:48:47 Re: Extending outfuncs support to utility statements
Previous Message Önder Kalacı 2022-09-22 16:13:54 Re: [PATCH] Use indexes on the subscriber when REPLICA IDENTITY is full on the publisher