From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Tom Dunstan" <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc>, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Commit fest queue |
Date: | 2008-04-11 17:54:46 |
Message-ID: | 14144.1207936486@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> In Trac, if I just want to loosely associate several tickets together
> I'd use *keywords*, e.g., put "index am" in the keywords list for
> several tickets, and then they'll show up prominently when I search
> for those terms.
Assuming you know what to search for, of course ...
> If I want something more structured I'd use a *milestone*. I'd create
> an "Index AM" milestone and attach all the relevant tickets to it.
> Then I can easily pull up a report of all open tickets on the Index AM
> milestone (or all closed tickets, or all tickets regardless of status,
> or all tickets assigned to me, or all tickets not assigned to anyone
> yet, or ...)
Yeah, you can do all that in bugzilla too (Red Hat uses tracking bugs
to such an extent that I think they outnumber the plain bugs :-().
It still pretty much sucks for what I want, which is to easily see an
overview of what's in the commit-fest queue organized in some helpful
fashion.
In any case, this still sounds like forcing our problem to fit the tool.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2008-04-11 17:55:32 | Re: Remove lossy-operator RECHECK flag? |
Previous Message | Dickson dos Santos Guedes | 2008-04-11 17:53:20 | Patch to add objetct size on "\d+" verbose output |