From: | Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Materialized views don't show up in information_schema |
Date: | 2014-10-18 14:40:55 |
Message-ID: | 1413643255628-5823559.post@n5.nabble.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Does someone know what other DBMSs do in this regard? I.e., do they
> put anything in INFORMATION_SCHEMA.VIEWS for matviews? What TABLE_TYPE
> do they use in INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES?
I can only speak for Oracle.
Oracle doesn't have INFORMATION_SCHEMA but their JDBC driver treats mviews
as tables. If you ask the driver for a list of tables (explicitly passing
"TABLE" as the only type to return), it will include mviews as well,
returning "MATERIALIZED VIEW" as the type of the object.
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Materialized-views-don-t-show-up-in-information-schema-tp5822643p5823559.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-10-18 14:46:42 | Re: get_actual_variable_range vs idx_scan/idx_tup_fetch |
Previous Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2014-10-18 14:38:37 | Re: get_actual_variable_range vs idx_scan/idx_tup_fetch |