| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Subject: | Re: Hitting CheckRelationLockedByMe() ASSERT with force_generic_plan |
| Date: | 2018-11-23 04:30:33 |
| Message-ID: | 1413.1542947433@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 at 22:33, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Now, to fix this issue either we need to hold proper lock before reaching
>> to ExecInitIndexScan() or teach ExecInitIndexScan() to take AccessShareLock
>> on the scan coming from CMD_DELETE.
> I'd say the following comment and code in nodeIndexscan.c is outdated:
I complained about this previously in
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/19465.1541636036@sss.pgh.pa.us
but got nothing but crickets :-(
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2018-11-23 04:41:26 | Re: Inadequate executor locking of indexes |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2018-11-23 04:03:59 | Re: Should new partitions inherit their tablespace from their parent? |