Re: 8.0.0beta3 duration logging patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Ed L(dot)" <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.0.0beta3 duration logging patch
Date: 2004-09-28 13:59:57
Message-ID: 14108.1096379997@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Your issue brings up that the boolean API doesn't really work well, and
> in fact highlights the fact that printing the duration as an independent
> capability really made no sense at all. Perhaps your approach is the
> proper solution --- to link them together.

I thought we had fixed things so that log_duration would print the
statement if it hadn't already been logged for other reasons. Did
that fix get broken again?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ed L. 2004-09-28 14:59:47 Re: 8.0.0beta3 duration logging patch
Previous Message Dave Page 2004-09-28 13:18:04 Re: VC++ psql build broken