Re: Performance issue: index not used on GROUP BY...

From: gmb <gmbouwer(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance issue: index not used on GROUP BY...
Date: 2014-09-03 19:50:26
Message-ID: 1409773826818-5817622.post@n5.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Thanks for the feedback, everybody.
I spent a couple of days trying to optimise this;
As mentioned , the increased memory is not an option for me, as this query
is part of a report that can be run by any user on an ad hoc basis.
Allocating the required memory to any session on demand is not feasible in
this environment.

In the end , it seems to me that a more sustainable solution will be to
introduce an additional table to carry the summarized values and lookup on
that table in this type of scenario.

Regards

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Performance-issue-index-not-used-on-GROUP-BY-tp5816702p5817622.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Huang, Suya 2014-09-04 07:33:08 Re: query performance with hstore vs. non-hstore
Previous Message Takashi Horikawa 2014-09-03 00:12:52 Re: why after increase the hash table partitions, tpmc decrease