From: | David G Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Hardening pg_upgrade |
Date: | 2014-08-21 18:43:42 |
Message-ID: | 1408646622255-5815748.post@n5.nabble.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote
> I had to make an exception for temporary tables because pg_upgrade uses
> temporary tables to collect schema information. I tried writing the
> query to use CTEs (second patch), but I would then have to have one
> query for 8.3, which doesn't support CTEs, and another for 8.4+, plus
> the CTE query was more complex than I liked. Another idea would be to
> drop 8.3 support (and remove lots of code to support that), but the
> recent large increase in the number of people upgrading from 8.4 makes
> that unattractive. (8.3 did use a different timestamp storage format
> though.)
Why not tell people on 8.3- that a direct upgrade is not supported but that
an indirect upgrade to 9.4 or earlier has to be performed first and then
that can be upgraded to 9.5+ ?
I'm not clear on how the 8.4 upgrades volume impacts a decision to support
8.3- upgrades?
David J.
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Hardening-pg-upgrade-tp5815735p5815748.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2014-08-21 18:48:52 | Re: WIP Patch for GROUPING SETS phase 1 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-08-21 18:13:30 | Re: WIP Patch for GROUPING SETS phase 1 |