Re: [HACKERS] libpq

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: chris(at)bitmead(dot)com
Cc: Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] libpq
Date: 2000-02-17 07:01:21
Message-ID: 14078.950770881@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> I posted this about a week ago, and it passed without comment.
> Does this mean I'm so far off track that no-one cares to comment,
> or I got it so right that no comment was needed?

I haven't looked at it because I am trying to finish up other stuff
before we go beta. Will get back to you later. I imagine other
people are in deadline mode also...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-02-17 07:14:26 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to identify an operator '=' for types 'numeric' and 'float8'
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-02-17 06:32:48 Re: SQL compliance, was Re: [HACKERS] follow-up on PC Week Labsbenchmark results