From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Larry White <ljw1001(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: jsonb format is pessimal for toast compression |
Date: | 2014-08-09 19:10:36 |
Message-ID: | 1407611436.2988.YahooMailNeo@web122302.mail.ne1.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
>> Trying to move the header to the end just for the sake of this
>> doesn't strike me as a good solution as it'll make things quite
>> a bit more complicated.
Why is that? How much harder would it be to add a single offset
field to the front to point to the part we're shifting to the end?
It is not all that unusual to put a directory at the end, like in
the .zip file format.
>> Is there a way we could interleave the likely-compressible user
>> data in with the header instead?
>
> Yeah, I was wondering about that too, but I don't immediately see
> how to do it without some sort of preprocessing step when we read
> the object (which'd be morally equivalent to converting a series
> of lengths into a pointer array).
That sounds far more complex and fragile than just moving the
indexes to the end.
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-08-09 19:51:02 | Re: jsonb format is pessimal for toast compression |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-08-09 18:16:01 | Re: Proposal to add a QNX 6.5 port to PostgreSQL |