| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Implementation details of schema permissions? |
| Date: | 2002-02-07 17:41:56 |
| Message-ID: | 14067.1013103716@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Tom, do you have plans yet on how to store permissions granted on schemas?
Haven't thought about it very hard. I would like to reuse the existing
ACL support, of course. We might need to generalize it to allow
different sets of permission bits for different kinds of objects.
[ thinks... ] AFAIR, the low-level ACL routines don't really know/care
much about the meanings of the bits, except for the I/O converters which
have to be able to map bits to code letters. So parameterization seems
pretty feasible. We could use atttypmod to let the I/O converters know
which code map applies to a particular ACL column, I think.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steven Singer | 2002-02-07 17:48:51 | Re: Replication |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2002-02-07 17:29:38 | Re: Suggestions for 7.3 date handling |