From: | Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Martín Marqués <martin(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-pkg-yum <pgsql-pkg-yum(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Missing python-argparse package on 9.4 |
Date: | 2014-07-14 07:18:04 |
Message-ID: | 1405322284.2990.3.camel@asus-laptop-03.gunduz.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-pkg-yum |
Hi,
On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 10:41 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> Will that cause any issues for people with EPEL enabled who're using
> python-argparse from there?
>
> http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/x86_64/repoview/python-argparse.html
I don't think so -- I am using the same spec file. If both repos are
enabled, yum will pick it from one of them (IIRC it is EPEL, because its
name < our name :) )
> (I increasingly think PGDG for RHEL should just depend on EPEL).
I agree, but given that I am currently having issues with EPEL 7, I
don't want to declare it until EPEK 7 becomes stable.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rafael Martinez Guerrero | 2014-07-14 20:13:34 | Re: Add PgBackMan to the yum-repo |
Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2014-07-14 02:41:18 | Re: Missing python-argparse package on 9.4 |