From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: explain root element for auto-explain |
Date: | 2009-08-20 14:47:04 |
Message-ID: | 14046.1250779624@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I have a couple of questions, however. First, in that long list of
> alternatives for a Plan node, can any of them occur more than once?
No.
> Second, we are using Item as a child of both Output and Sort-Key nodes.
> Are they really describing the same thing? And in any case, Item is a
> wonderfully non-informative name, as is Output, for that matter.
They are both describing expressions. I wanted to rename Item as Expr,
if you'll recall. But I think we should have a concrete plan about
all the tweaks we want to make to the output schema before doing
anything, so I haven't pushed to change it immediately.
I don't see anything wrong with Output --- what else would you call the
output expressions of a node?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ygor Degani | 2009-08-20 15:13:57 | Duplicated Keys in PITR |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-08-20 14:22:38 | Re: explain root element for auto-explain |