| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: compiler warning with VS 2017 |
| Date: | 2017-05-05 04:50:15 |
| Message-ID: | 14015.1493959815@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I am getting a compiler warning when I build the latest HEAD PostgreSQL with
> visual studio 2017.
> The code at the line is,
> tuple->values[i] = (char *) (Size)0xdeadbeef; /* make bad usage more obvious */
Yeah, you're not the first to complain about this. To my mind that
coding is not pretty, not cute, and not portable: there's not even
a good reason to believe that dereferencing the pointer would result
in a crash. Perhaps the author can explain to us why this is better
than just assigning NULL.
Actually, looking around a bit there, it's not even clear why
we should be booby-trapping the value of an unchanged column in
the first place. So I'd say that not only is the code dubious
but the comment is inadequate too.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-05-05 05:01:19 | Re: statement_timeout is not working as expected with postgres_fdw |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-05-05 03:00:02 | Re: CTE inlining |