From: | David G Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | [9.3] Should we mention "set_config(...)" in 18.1.3 in Server Configuration? |
Date: | 2014-05-21 19:00:27 |
Message-ID: | 1400698826956-5804655.post@n5.nabble.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Section 18.1.3 is named "18.1.3. Other Ways to Set Parameters" yet does not
reference the ability to use "set_config(...)" to make changes to
configuration parameters.
Something like (as a final sentence):
An alternative to the SQL "SET" command is to use the [link]set_config[link]
function.
Also, I would suggest modifying the function definitions in table 9-58 to
include the data types:
current_setting(setting_name text)
set_config(setting_name text, new_value text, is_local boolean)
David J.
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/9-3-Should-we-mention-set-config-in-18-1-3-in-Server-Configuration-tp5804655.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - docs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-05-21 20:37:46 | Re: [9.3] Should we mention "set_config(...)" in 18.1.3 in Server Configuration? |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2014-05-12 16:44:29 | Re: Typo fix in doc/src/sgml/test-shm-mq.sgml |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-05-21 20:23:34 | Re: pg_upgrade fails: Mismatch of relation OID in database 8.4 -> 9.3 |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-05-21 18:31:26 | Re: pg_upgrade fails: Mismatch of relation OID in database 8.4 -> 9.3 |