[9.3] Should we mention "set_config(...)" in 18.1.3 in Server Configuration?

From: David G Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [9.3] Should we mention "set_config(...)" in 18.1.3 in Server Configuration?
Date: 2014-05-21 19:00:27
Message-ID: 1400698826956-5804655.post@n5.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

Section 18.1.3 is named "18.1.3. Other Ways to Set Parameters" yet does not
reference the ability to use "set_config(...)" to make changes to
configuration parameters.

Something like (as a final sentence):

An alternative to the SQL "SET" command is to use the [link]set_config[link]
function.

Also, I would suggest modifying the function definitions in table 9-58 to
include the data types:

current_setting(setting_name text)
set_config(setting_name text, new_value text, is_local boolean)

David J.

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/9-3-Should-we-mention-set-config-in-18-1-3-in-Server-Configuration-tp5804655.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - docs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-05-21 20:37:46 Re: [9.3] Should we mention "set_config(...)" in 18.1.3 in Server Configuration?
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2014-05-12 16:44:29 Re: Typo fix in doc/src/sgml/test-shm-mq.sgml

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-05-21 20:23:34 Re: pg_upgrade fails: Mismatch of relation OID in database 8.4 -> 9.3
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2014-05-21 18:31:26 Re: pg_upgrade fails: Mismatch of relation OID in database 8.4 -> 9.3