| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: meson PGXS compatibility |
| Date: | 2022-10-12 05:50:07 |
| Message-ID: | 13f9fea7-e196-3956-f297-98797144c20c@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 05.10.22 22:07, Andres Freund wrote:
> 0001: autoconf: Unify CFLAGS_SSE42 and CFLAGS_ARMV8_CRC32C
I wonder, there has been some work lately to use SIMD and such in other
places. Would that affect what kinds of extra CPU-specific compiler
flags and combinations we might need?
Seems fine otherwise.
> 0005: meson: Add PGXS compatibility
>
> The actual meson PGXS compatibility. Plenty more replacements to do, but
> suffices to build common extensions on a few platforms.
>
> What level of completeness do we want to require here?
I have tried this with a few extensions. Seems to work alright. I
don't think we need to overthink this. The way it's set up, if someone
needs additional variables set, they can easily be added.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2022-10-12 05:50:11 | Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2022-10-12 05:48:14 | Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("prev_first_lsn < cur_txn->first_lsn", File: "reorderbuffer.c", Line: 927, PID: 568639) |