Re: regression failure on master with --disable-integer-datetimes

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Subject: Re: regression failure on master with --disable-integer-datetimes
Date: 2014-05-06 19:18:02
Message-ID: 1399403882.27807.40.camel@sussancws0025
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 14:48 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hm. As the test stands, it requires a float-timestamps implementation
> to store a value of 3600000610.000001 seconds, which is 16 decimal digits

The test value has 1e9 hours, which is 3.6e12 seconds, plus 6 more
digits for microseconds is 18 decimal digits. If, as you say, 15 digits
can be reliably extracted from a double, then we need to cut three zeros
(which matches my simple test of just removing zeros until it achieves
the microsecond precision).

> However, removing *any* digits seems like it mostly defeats the point of
> the test. Maybe we should just lose the test?

The reason I thought it might still have some value is because it would
have still caught the problem that 4318daec patched. But I'm fine with
removing it.

(Though, I should add a comment indicating that it's not testing the
true maximum length.)

> A different solution is to add a variant expected-output file, though
> I'm not terribly thrilled with that answer.

Nor am I.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-05-06 19:37:27 Re: regression failure on master with --disable-integer-datetimes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-05-06 18:48:31 Re: regression failure on master with --disable-integer-datetimes