Re:

From: Henry Korszun <henryk302(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: Scott Whitney <swhitney(at)journyx(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re:
Date: 2014-04-25 17:57:16
Message-ID: 1398448636.25048.YahooMailNeo@web162704.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

There IS a trigger file, which does appear to have been "touch"ed.  But the problem is that a fail-over hasn't really occurred since the original read/write primary continues to be a fully functioning read/write machine. But it's no longer replicating to the erstwhile standby, which has become read/write.  Bottom line, I now have 2 read/write machines, but with no replication between them.

On Friday, April 25, 2014 1:43 PM, Scott Whitney <scott(at)journyx(dot)com> wrote:

Sounds like you might have a "trigger_file" set in your recovery.conf. Do you? That or someone is issuing a pg_ctl promote command.

________________________________

I'm using PostgreSQL 9.2.4 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20070115 (SUSE Linux), 64-bit.
>
>I set up streaming replication for a read/write primary and a read/only
standby. The replication works fine for a while, and then out of the
blue BOTH machines become read/write, but with no replication from the
original primary to the newly read/write standby.
>
>The only log entry that seems relevant is as follows:
FATAL,57P01,"terminating walreceiver process due to administrator
command",,,,,,,,"ProcessWalRcvInterrupts, walreceiver.c:150",""
>
>Any help/guidance would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
>
>

In response to

  • Re: at 2014-04-25 17:43:33 from Scott Whitney

Responses

  • Re: at 2014-04-25 18:00:06 from Payal Singh
  • Re: at 2014-04-25 18:00:43 from Scott Whitney

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Payal Singh 2014-04-25 18:00:06 Re:
Previous Message Payal Singh 2014-04-25 17:47:43 Re: