| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | ujkavlade(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: HAVING clause working in postgres 8.0, but not in 8.2 |
| Date: | 2007-07-03 22:13:13 |
| Message-ID: | 13975.1183500793@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
ujkavlade(at)gmail(dot)com writes:
> In PostgreSql 8.0, SELECT number FROM numbers HAVING number = 5;
> returns 5
> But in 8.2, it gives me the following error: ERROR: column
> "numbers.number" must appear in the GROUP BY clause or be used in an
> aggregate function.
> In the documentation, it says that HAVING can be used without GROUP BY
> or aggregate functions.
It can; whether it's useful or not is another question.
Per the 8.1 release notes:
* Fix HAVING without any aggregate functions or GROUP BY so that the
query returns a single group
Previously, such a case would treat the HAVING clause the same as
a WHERE clause. This was not per spec.
The above query is incorrect because it hasn't done anything to create
a grouped column.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Raymond O'Donnell | 2007-07-03 22:37:57 | Mugs 'n stuff |
| Previous Message | Ron Johnson | 2007-07-03 21:46:05 | Re: What O/S or hardware feature would be useful for databases? |