Update to 9.1.12

From: "Viktor" <spoon(at)planet(dot)ee>
To: "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Update to 9.1.12
Date: 2014-04-09 11:29:34
Message-ID: 1397042974.1665600d@webmail.zone.ee
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Hello,

We are currently running PostgreSQL version 9.1.9-1~bpo60+1 (Debian Squeeze) and would like to update it to 9.1 9.1.12-0wheezy1.

But there is one serious issue about this update:

"
E.3.2. Changes  
Fix VACUUM's tests to see whether it can update relfrozenxid (Andres Freund)
In some cases VACUUM (either manual or autovacuum) could incorrectly advance a table's relfrozenxid value, allowing tuples to escape freezing, causing those rows to become invisible once 2^31 transactions have elapsed. The probability of data loss is fairly low since multiple incorrect advancements would need to happen before actual loss occurs, but it's not zero. Users upgrading from releases 9.0.4 or 8.4.8 or earlier are not affected, but all later versions contain the bug.
The issue can be ameliorated by, after upgrading, vacuuming all tables in all databases while having vacuum_freeze_table_age set to zero. This will fix any latent corruption but will not be able to fix all pre-existing data errors. However, an installation can be presumed safe after performing this vacuuming if it has executed fewer than 2^31 update transactions in its lifetime (check this with SELECT txid_current() < 2^31).
"

Please explain should I run VACUUM on all tables after the update if >

postgres=# SELECT txid_current() < 2^31;
 ?column?
----------
 t
(1 row)


--
Best regards,
Viktor

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Albe Laurenz 2014-04-09 12:34:49 Re: Update to 9.1.12
Previous Message Murthy Nunna 2014-04-08 18:27:41 Re: robust archiving of WAL segments