| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Minimum supported version of Python? |
| Date: | 2014-03-18 02:31:53 |
| Message-ID: | 1395109913.18470.10.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 2014-03-16 at 22:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, if you want to consider python 2.3 as supported, I have a buildfarm
> machine I am about to put online that has 2.3 on it. If I spin it up with
> python enabled, I expect you to see to it that it starts passing. If you
> won't do that, I'm going to change the documentation.
As I said, according to my testing, 2.3 is supported. If your
experience is different, then please submit a reproducible bug report.
> As for 2.4 vs 2.5, I don't have a lot of faith that we're really
> supporting anything that's not represented in the buildfarm...
There are many other features that the build farm doesn't test and that
I don't have a lot of faith in, but I'm not proposing to remove those.
I don't control what the build farm tests, I only control my own work.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2014-03-18 02:47:30 | Re: Minimum supported version of Python? |
| Previous Message | Kouhei Kaigai | 2014-03-18 02:31:04 | Re: contrib/cache_scan (Re: What's needed for cache-only table scan?) |