| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 7.4 build problem on Linux Vserver |
| Date: | 2003-12-11 16:35:38 |
| Message-ID: | 13941.1071160538@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> How is "prod" getting into that command line? I suspect it's coming
>> from an environment variable like PROFILE or CFLAGS ...
> Is there a case for making Makefile/shell variables and defines we use
> have less generic names?
Having configure/make depend on CC, CFLAGS, etc is standard behavior;
renaming those would increase the surprise factor, not reduce it.
PROFILE is maybe a borderline case, since I'm not sure how many packages
use it the way we do. But I'd be at least as inclined to blame Dave's
environment for using a generic variable name as blame our makefiles.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2003-12-11 16:43:02 | Re: PostgreSQL port to pure Java? |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-12-11 16:23:02 | Re: 7.4 build problem on Linux Vserver |