Re: Is it reasonable to store double[] arrays of 30K elements

From: lup <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is it reasonable to store double[] arrays of 30K elements
Date: 2014-02-14 22:07:43
Message-ID: 1392415663145-5792099.post@n5.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Would 10K elements of float[3] make any difference in terms of read/write
performance?
Or 240K byte array?

Or are these all functionally the same issue for the server? If so,
intriguing possibilities abound. :)

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Is-it-reasonable-to-store-double-arrays-of-30K-elements-tp5790562p5792099.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message bhargavi 2014-02-14 23:04:02 Re: Postgres 9.3 Installation Problems Windows 7 64 Bit Pro
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2014-02-14 18:15:03 Re: automatically refresh all materialized views?