Re: generic pseudotype IO functions?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: generic pseudotype IO functions?
Date: 2014-01-13 12:12:41
Message-ID: 1389615161.18185.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 17:36 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> FWIW, I am perfectly fine with duplicating the functions for now - I
> just thought that that might not be the best way but I didn't (and
> still
> don't) have a strong opinion.

Could we just put 0 in for the functions' OID and have code elsewhere
that errors "there is no input function for this type"?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rajeev rastogi 2014-01-13 13:12:43 Re: Standalone synchronous master
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-01-13 11:16:15 Re: [BUG] Archive recovery failure on 9.3+.