Re: ECPG could not connect to the database.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ECPG could not connect to the database.
Date: 2001-01-08 08:35:04
Message-ID: 13887.978942904@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 02:52:07PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I do not see how that can be ecpg's fault --- it just does
>>
>> this->connection = PQsetdbLogin(NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, dbname, user, passwd);
>>
>> which means that any specification of the host must come from the PGHOST
>> environment variable and will be handled entirely inside libpq.

> Not exactly. It is possible to use PGHOST but you also can add the hostname
> to the dbname.

Have you tried it lately? I suspect that you are depending on code that
is not in libpq's current sources anymore. I fully agree with Peter E's
reasons for removing it, too. We do not need to overload the definition
of libpq's dbname parameter.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message hubert depesz lubaczewski 2001-01-08 08:38:50 functions returning multiple rows?
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2001-01-08 08:06:24 Re: ECPG could not connect to the database.