Re: [BUG FIX] Version number expressed in octal form by mistake

From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUG FIX] Version number expressed in octal form by mistake
Date: 2013-12-29 21:35:14
Message-ID: 1388352914.4518.YahooMailNeo@web122305.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> writes:
>> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> So I'm inclined to propose that we set min/max to 0 and 999999
>>> here.
>>
>> Something like the attached back-patched to 8.4?
>
> Works for me.

Done.

Thanks for the report, Joel!

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian Pflug 2013-12-29 23:33:56 Re: XML Issue with DTDs
Previous Message Sergey Konoplev 2013-12-29 21:22:20 Re: Polymorphic function calls