Re: uintptr_t for Datum

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: uintptr_t for Datum
Date: 2009-12-31 18:08:49
Message-ID: 13871.1262282929@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> BTW, it looks like the patch is showing a manual change to
>> pg_config.h.in. Don't do that. Run autoheader.

> I wasn't aware autoheader existed. Is that new or has it alwasy been
> part of autoconf?

It's always been there, or at least for many years. pg_config.h.in
really ought to be thought of the same as configure: you don't edit
it, you just generate it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Turner, Ian 2009-12-31 18:09:40 Re: Re-enabling SET ROLE in security definer functions
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-12-31 17:50:20 Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking