| From: | Jeff Amiel <becauseimjeff(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | pg_prewarm status |
| Date: | 2013-12-12 15:27:03 |
| Message-ID: | 1386862023.49075.YahooMailNeo@web161404.mail.bf1.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Trying to follow the threads and other references - but I can't determine where this patch ended up.
(http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmobRrRxCO+t6gcQrw_dJw+Uf9ZEdwf9beJnu+RB5TEBjEw@mail.gmail.com)
I'm trying to experiment with some new hardware - and the functionality to add specific tables/indexes into cache ahead of time will benefit me greatly.
I found a page describing how to apply the patch to 9.2.4 (jumping through some hoops - http://issues.collectionspace.org/browse/UCJEPS-432) and was hoping to get a version to apply to 9.3.X
Can anyone advise me on how I might get this 'applied' to a 9.3.X source code base or any other options to denote specific relations that I'd like to get directly into shared_buffers?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Wolfgang Keller | 2013-12-12 16:18:02 | Re: postgresql.org inconsistent (Re: [GENERAL] PG replication across DataCenters) |
| Previous Message | Dev Kumkar | 2013-12-12 07:17:11 | Re: Case sensitivity |