Re: allow changing autovacuum_max_workers without restarting

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: allow changing autovacuum_max_workers without restarting
Date: 2025-01-07 03:29:07
Message-ID: 1386858.1736220547@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 06:36:43PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> We already changed the max_connections default for affected systems
>> as a consequence of 38da05346, so I don't think the argument about not
>> changing it holds much water.

> I see. Here's a version that uses your max_connections / 8 idea. I've
> lowered the initial default value of autovacuum_worker_slots to 12 to keep
> the code as simple as possible. I considered trying 16 in the first
> iteration or constructing a complicated formula like
> autovacuum_worker_slots = (max_connections * 13) / 75 - 1
> but this stuff is pretty fragile already, so I felt that simplicity was
> desirable in this case.

+1 for simplicity ... but on reflection, what do you think about
using max_connections / 6? That would keep autovacuum_worker_slots
at 100 / 6 = 16 for the vast majority of systems. For the worst case
*BSD machines, we'd select 25 / 6 = 4 which results in consuming one
more semaphore than where we were yesterday. I'm willing to accept
that outcome though, since we still have 3 or so to spare.

Other than the specific magic number, your patch LGTM.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2025-01-07 04:43:19 Re: Sort functions with specialized comparators
Previous Message Юрий Соколов 2025-01-07 02:49:13 Re: [RFC] Lock-free XLog Reservation from WAL