| From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephan Fabel <sfabel(at)hawaii(dot)edu>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Q: regarding backends |
| Date: | 2013-12-09 23:11:21 |
| Message-ID: | 1386630681.32849.YahooMailNeo@web162903.mail.bf1.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Stephan Fabel <sfabel(at)hawaii(dot)edu> wrote:
> has the PostgreSQL community ever considered different key/value
> backends (sort of like MySQL with its many different options)?
>
> We'd be very interested in seeing the effects of integrating LMDB
> in terms of performance gains.
You might want to consider writing a Foreign Data Wrapper (FDW) to
allow tables defined in LMDB to be accessed from PostgreSQL
queries.
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Foreign_data_wrappers
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dmitry Koterov | 2013-12-09 23:13:17 | Replication: GZIP compression in WAL sender/receiver processes communication? |
| Previous Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2013-12-09 22:51:34 | Re: client that supports editing views |