Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?

MauMau wrote
> From: "Tom Lane" <

> tgl(at)(dot)pa

> >
>> There is no enthusiasm for a quick-hack solution here, and most people
>> don't actually agree with your proposal that these errors should never
>> get logged. So no, that is not happening. You can hack your local
>> copy that way if you like of course, but it's not getting committed.
>
> Oh, I may have misunderstood your previous comments. I got the impression
> that you and others regard those messages (except "too many clients") as
> unnecessary in server log.
>
> 1. FATAL: the database system is starting up

How about altering the message to tone down the severity by a half-step...

FATAL: (probably) not! - the database system is starting up

David J.

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/RFC-Shouldn-t-we-remove-annoying-FATAL-messages-from-server-log-tp5781899p5782236.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.