Re: Regression tests failing if not launched on db "regression"

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Regression tests failing if not launched on db "regression"
Date: 2013-12-06 03:02:45
Message-ID: 1386298965.2743.5.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 17:12 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> IMHO, the regression test suite would gain in consistency and
> portability if we do not refer to data that is database-dependent.

I once did some similar fixes (e3d9dceef62e072cf9a433ae6c74a1c5a10d94d3)
but then didn't pursue it any longer, because it would restrict what we
could actually test. I don't remember what I was trying to do there,
but why do you need to run the tests in a different database?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2013-12-06 03:05:14 Re: dblink performance regression
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-12-06 02:53:59 Re: dblink performance regression