Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency

From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Hilbert, Sebastian" <Sebastian(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency
Date: 2013-11-30 20:07:11
Message-ID: 1385842031.86101.YahooMailNeo@web162904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> Once the patch is applied, I will be patching pg_upgrade by appending to

> PGOPTIONS, but that will only be for 9.4.  The patch will be too risky
> and there are not enough problem reports to override that and warrant
> backpatching.

pg_dumpall patch applied, back to 8.4.

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noel Diaz 2013-11-30 20:17:03 Full Stored Procedure Support, any time soon ?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-11-30 17:10:19 Re: Trust intermediate CA for client certificates

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2013-11-30 21:00:28 Re: Extension Templates S03E11
Previous Message Jeffrey Walton 2013-11-30 19:58:34 Re: fe-secure.c and SSL/TLS