Re: Revised Patch to allow multiple table locks in "Unison"

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Padgett <npadgett(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)cygnus(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Revised Patch to allow multiple table locks in "Unison"
Date: 2001-08-02 21:01:05
Message-ID: 13858.996786065@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Neil Padgett <npadgett(at)redhat(dot)com> writes:
>> This seems fine to me (and in fact I thought we'd already agreed to it).

> Here's the patch then. =)

[ quick mental checklist... ] You forgot the documentation updates.
Otherwise it looks good.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2001-08-02 21:19:04 Re: Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-08-02 20:58:50 Re: Revised Patch to allow multiple table locks in "Unison"

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-08-02 21:11:46 Re: Patch for Improved Syntax Error Reporting
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-08-02 20:58:50 Re: Revised Patch to allow multiple table locks in "Unison"