From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | AK <alkuzo(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Should we improve documentation on isolation levels? |
Date: | 2013-11-27 19:46:31 |
Message-ID: | 1385581591.20715.YahooMailNeo@web162906.mail.bf1.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
AK <alkuzo(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The following is not precise:
>
> 13.2.1. Read Committed Isolation Level
>
> "Also note that two successive SELECT commands can see different data, even
> though they are within a single transaction, if other transactions commit
> changes during execution of the first SELECT."
>
> I think it should be re-worded as follows
>
> "Also note that two successive SELECT commands can see different data, even
> though they are within a single transaction, if other transactions commit
> after the first SELECT starts, and before the second SELECT starts."
>
> The reason: there could be other DML running between these two SELECTs.
That's a fair point. I'll commit something to the master branch.
I don't think this rises to the level of a documentation bug that
needs to be back-patched.
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-11-27 19:49:01 | Re: Modify the DECLARE CURSOR command tag depending on the scrollable flag |
Previous Message | Boszormenyi Zoltan | 2013-11-27 19:41:48 | Re: Modify the DECLARE CURSOR command tag depending on the scrollable flag |