Re[2]: [GENERAL] freeze cannot be finished

From: Миша Тюрин <tmihail(at)bk(dot)ru>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Sergey Burladyan <eshkinkot(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re[2]: [GENERAL] freeze cannot be finished
Date: 2013-11-13 15:51:53
Message-ID: 1384357913.562192319@f216.i.mail.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


Hello, Tom! Thank you for so fast answer.
We did manual vacuum freeze with delay 10 also but unfortunately vacuum did nothing with pg_class.relfrozenxid too.

Vacuum delay values like 10-40 work very well for many years in our production cases.

> It's not terribly surprising that it's failing to keep up with what
> needs to be done.
why?

Thanks in advance!

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Ribe 2013-11-13 15:58:18 what checksum algo?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-11-13 15:37:22 Re: freeze cannot be finished