Re: backup.sgml-cmd-v003.patch

On 11/08/2013 03:42:56 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> On 11/08/2013 12:18 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> >
> > On 11/08/2013 02:12:56 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Joshua D. Drake
> >> <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
> >> wrote:

> >>>> Should I go ahead and apply that portion, then?
> >>> I am certainly not opposed.
> >>
> >> OK, done.
> >
> > So.... Joshusa/Ivan Do you want to send another
> > version of the patch with the committed changes
> > omitted for further review?
> >
>
> I have no problem having Ivan submit another patch, outside of the
> multiple patch requirement. If you guys will accept a single patch
> file
> with the agreed changes, then we are good.

I can't say what will be accepted and haven't really kept
track of what has been accepted. If there's more that
you want to patch then send that and we'll
work from there.

Karl <kop(at)meme(dot)com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein