Re: dsm use of uint64

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: dsm use of uint64
Date: 2013-11-02 03:45:06
Message-ID: 1383363906.4987.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 12:17 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:11:41PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> When I wrote the dynamic shared memory patch, I used uint64 everywhere
> >> to measure sizes - rather than, as we do for the main shared memory
> >> segment, Size. This now seems to me to have been the wrong decision;

This change is now causing compiler warnings on 32-bit platforms. You
can see them here, for example:
http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=lapwing&dt=2013-11-01%2020%3A45%3A01&stg=make

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2013-11-02 09:10:32 Re: Record comparison compiler warning
Previous Message David Johnston 2013-11-02 02:57:25 Re: Feature request: Optimizer improvement