Re: PostgreSQL Point In Time Recovery

From: Jayadevan <maymala(dot)jayadevan(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Point In Time Recovery
Date: 2013-10-26 06:14:42
Message-ID: 1382768082809-5775997.post@n5.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Alan Hodgson wrote
> Well, yeah. The point was that you possibly could run it for a while to
> "catch
> up" without taking a new base backup if you desired. You should also keep
> copies of it for PITR.

Something like this -
delayed replication
<http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.6/en/replication-delayed.html> might
help. I could say lag by 12 hours, or 10000 transactions...

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/PostgreSQL-Point-In-Time-Recovery-tp5775717p5775997.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Haase 2013-10-26 06:23:29 Re: PostgreSQL Point In Time Recovery
Previous Message Patrick Dung 2013-10-26 05:00:29 Re: (collation) Building postgresql on FreeBSD, the pros and cons of icu