From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Rafael Martinez <r(dot)m(dot)guerrero(at)usit(dot)uio(dot)no> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PITR backup history files with identical 2nd part file names |
Date: | 2010-01-21 21:10:17 |
Message-ID: | 13816.1264108217@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Rafael Martinez <r(dot)m(dot)guerrero(at)usit(dot)uio(dot)no> writes:
> After upgrading to 8.3.9 and moving some our PostgreSQL clusters to a
> new server yesterday, we have experienced a strange thing this past night.
> All PITR backup history files created when running a PITR base backup on
> all PostgreSQL clusters running in this new server (at different hours
> during the night) got an identical 2nd part file name.
> <24 digits>.00000020.backup e.g.000000020000020800000060.00000020.backup
I think this is normal behavior now, if you have an unloaded server.
pg_start_backup now forces a segment switch, so if nothing much else is
happening it's quite likely that the recorded start point will be the
beginning of the WAL segment (plus the page header size).
> Is it normal to get the same 2nd part of the file name all the time? How
> is this value generated?
It's just the current offset within the current WAL segment.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-01-21 21:22:30 | Re: primary key error message |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-01-21 20:51:09 | Re: primary key error message |