From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Spiegelberg, Greg" <gspiegelberg(at)isodxsolutions(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: duplicate key violates unique constraint |
Date: | 2007-05-10 15:28:41 |
Message-ID: | 13812.1178810921@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
"Spiegelberg, Greg" <gspiegelberg(at)isodxsolutions(dot)com> writes:
> As you can see, it's only providing the key1 column and the sequence is
> providing the value for the column with the constraint. How can this be
> happening?
Perhaps at some point you manually inserted an id value past the
then-current sequence value?
> Now, I don't know if this just hasn't been tested or is a documented
> feature (a.k.a. bug) but something does not seem right here. In this
> test case I'm able to get the same sequence ID's via two psql
> connections to the same database on the same sequence.
No, you've misunderstood currval(). That gives the value most recently
obtained by nextval() within your own session; it is not affected by any
subsequent manipulation of the sequence.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mikko Partio | 2007-05-10 15:30:27 | Re: duplicate key violates unique constraint |
Previous Message | Peter Koczan | 2007-05-10 15:26:56 | Re: upgrade 8.0.3 -> 8.2.4 |