From: | Michael Graham <mgraham(at)bloxx(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fighting the autovacuumer (to prevent wraparound) |
Date: | 2013-10-03 19:18:06 |
Message-ID: | 1380827886.16581.82.camel@smokey |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 11:53 -0700, bricklen wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Michael Graham <mgraham(at)bloxx(dot)com>
> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We partition the data in postgres in a per-month basis and run
> a script
> to delete old partitions.
>
>
> Does "delete" = "drop"?
No I'm truncating the tables for that partition (sorry I should have
made that clear in my original message).
> Sometimes this script fails and the delete
> doesn't happen because of a deadlock, today I noticed that it
> was the
> autovacuumer that fighting with the script.
>
>
> Are you uninheriting the partition before attempting to get rid of it?
> Eg.
>
> ALTER TABLE your_partition NO INHERIT the_parent_table;
I'm not no, will that help? I see that the autovacuumer is vacuuming
the actual partition that I want to truncate to the parent but I do do
an analyse on the parent table after the truncate but in the same
transaction.
Thanks,
--
Michael Graham <mgraham(at)bloxx(dot)com>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John R Pierce | 2013-10-03 19:24:04 | Re: Fighting the autovacuumer (to prevent wraparound) |
Previous Message | bricklen | 2013-10-03 18:53:06 | Re: Fighting the autovacuumer (to prevent wraparound) |