Re: Completing PL support for Event Triggers

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Completing PL support for Event Triggers
Date: 2013-10-02 00:30:07
Message-ID: 1380673807.22785.15.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2013-09-13 at 22:40 +0200, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Please find attached to this email three patches covering the missing PL
> support for Event Triggers: pltcl, plperl and plpython.

For plperl, the previous reviews mostly apply analogously. In addition,
I have these specific points:

- In plperl_event_trigger_build_args(), the hv_ksplit() call is probably
unnecessary.

- plperl_call_perl_event_trigger_func and plperl_call_perl_trigger_func
as well as plperl_event_trigger_handler and plperl_trigger_handler have
a lot of overlap could perhaps be combined or refactored differently.

- In plperl_event_trigger_handler(), a point is being made about setting
up current_call_data before SPI_connect. Other handler functions don't
do this, though. It's not quite clear to me on first readong why it's
done differently here.

- Like I pointed out for the pltcl patch, calling trigger functions as
event triggers and vice versa is not detected in
compile_plperl_function, but I guess this can only happen if you
manually butcher the function after you have set up the trigger.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-10-02 00:42:46 Re: [PATCH] Revive line type
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2013-10-02 00:23:01 Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation