| From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: record identical operator - Review |
| Date: | 2013-09-28 19:03:20 |
| Message-ID: | 1380395000.92107.YahooMailNeo@web162902.mail.bf1.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> I think we need to see a patch from Kevin that shows all the row
>> comparisons documented and we can see the impact of the
>> user-visibile part.
First draft attached.
> I'm inclined to first submit a proposed documentation patch for the
> existing record operators, and see if we can make everyone happy
> with that, and *then* see about adding documentation for the new
> ones. Trying to deal with both at once is likely to increase
> confusion and wheel-spinning.
When I took a stab at it, the new operators only seemed to merit a
single paragraph, so that is included after all.
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| record-identical-v2b.patch | text/x-diff | 8.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-09-28 23:56:21 | Re: logical changeset generation v6.1 |
| Previous Message | Steve Singer | 2013-09-28 17:25:09 | Re: logical changeset generation v6 |