From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Farhan Husain <russoue(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Abnormal performance difference between Postgres and MySQL |
Date: | 2009-02-24 02:00:58 |
Message-ID: | 138.1235440858@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Farhan Husain <russoue(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> This sort here:
>> -> Sort (cost=565372.46..568084.16 rows=1084680 width=74) (actual
>> time=5410606.604..5410606.628 rows=31 loops=1)
>> Sort Key: a1.subj
>> Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 489474kB
>> -> Seq Scan on jena_g1t1_stmt a1 (cost=0.00..456639.59
>> rows=1084680 width=74) (actual time=0.043..44005.780 rows=3192000 loops=1)
> Seems to be the problem. There are a few things that seem odd, the
> first is that it estimates it will return 1M ros, but returns only 31.
> The other is that sorting 31 rows is taking 5410606 milliseconds.
Uh, no, it's sorting 3192000 rows --- look at the input scan. Evidently
only the first 31 of those rows are getting fetched out of the sort,
though.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-02-24 02:18:59 | Re: Abnormal performance difference between Postgres and MySQL |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2009-02-24 01:53:50 | Re: Abnormal performance difference between Postgres and MySQL |